"Chitrit tu, mein hoon rekha- kram,
madhur raag tu, mein swar-sangam,
tu aseem mein seema ka bhram,
kaaya-chhaya mein rahasmay,
preyasi priyatam ka abhinay kya !
Tum mujh me priya, phir parichay kya"...Mahadevi Verma
Mahadevi Verma's celebrated lyric is among the
finest expressions of mystical poetry in modern Hindi literature. At first
reading, the poem appears to be an intimate dialogue between two lovers; yet,
as is characteristic of Indian mystical literature, the language of earthly
love serves only as a metaphor for a deeper metaphysical truth. The
"beloved" (priya) is not merely a human companion but the
Eternal Reality itself, while the speaker represents the individual self
yearning for complete identity with the Supreme. Read in the light of the
Upanishads, the poem becomes an exquisite poetic exposition of the relationship
between Atman (the individual Self) and Brahman (the Absolute), a
relationship that ultimately culminates in the realisation that they are not
two separate entities but one indivisible reality.
The opening line,
"Chitrit tu, main hoon rekha-kram"
"You are the completed picture; I am but its outline,"………..
immediately establishes a hierarchy of
existence. The outline has no independent meaning apart from the completed
image. It derives its identity entirely from the picture that gives it form and
purpose. This recalls the Upanishadic conception that the individual self possesses no independent existence apart from Brahman. The Brihadaranyaka
Upanishad repeatedly asserts that everything derives its reality from the
Self alone. Just as an outline cannot claim autonomy from the painting it
delineates, the finite ego exists only because it participates in the Infinite.
Mahadevi's metaphor thus dissolves the illusion of separateness without denying
the individuality through which the Infinite becomes manifest.
The second
metaphor deepens this ontological dependence:
"Madhur raag tu, main
swar-sangam."
"You are the sweet melody; I am merely its harmony."
In Indian classical music, individual notes
possess significance only when they merge into the larger melodic structure. A
solitary note, however beautiful, cannot constitute a raaga. Likewise,
according to the Upanishads, the individual consciousness finds fulfilment only
in its participation in universal consciousness. The Chandogya Upanishad
compares all rivers merging into the sea, losing their separate names while
retaining their essential substance. Mahadevi similarly presents the individual
not as an isolated existence but as an indispensable yet inseparable expression
of the greater cosmic harmony. Perhaps the most explicitly Upanishadic line in
the poem is:
"Tu aseem, main seemÄ kÄ
bhram."
"You are the Infinite; I am only the illusion of boundaries."
This is remarkably close to the central
doctrine of Advaita Vedanta. Brahman alone is infinite (ananta), eternal
and indivisible. The limitations experienced by the individual are products of MÄyÄ,
the cosmic illusion that superimposes finitude upon the infinite Self. Mahadevi
does not merely say that she is limited; she goes a step further by calling
herself the illusion of limitation. This distinction is philosophically
profound. The limitation itself has no ultimate reality. It exists only because
the mind mistakes the infinite for the finite, much as one mistakes a rope for
a snake in the famous Advaitic analogy. Her expression mirrors the Upanishadic
understanding that the apparent separation between the individual soul and
Brahman is not real but epistemological; it arises from ignorance (avidya),
not from any actual division in existence.
The succeeding line,
"Kaaya-chhaaya mein
rahasmay,"
"In the
mystery of form and shadow,"
introduces another subtle metaphysical image.
Body and shadow remain inseparable, yet they are not identical. The shadow
possesses no independent substance; it exists only because of the body.
Similarly, the phenomenal world appears as a shadow cast by the Absolute. The Mundaka
Upanishad distinguishes between the higher and lower knowledge, urging the
seeker to move beyond appearances to the imperishable reality that underlies
them. Mahadevi's imagery conveys precisely this distinction between the
transient world of appearances and the eternal substratum from which those
appearances arise.
The poem reaches its philosophical climax in
the closing couplet:
"Preyasi-priyatam kÄ abhinay kyÄ!
Tum mujh mein priya, phir parichay kyÄ."
"Why
enact the roles of lover and beloved?
When you already dwell within me, what need is there for introduction?"
This is one of the most profound poetic
affirmations of non-duality in modern Hindi literature. The very idea of
introduction presupposes two separate identities. One introduces oneself only
to another. If the beloved already resides within the self, then all external
relationships become symbolic rather than literal. The apparent duality between
lover and beloved collapses into unity.
Here Mahadevi comes extraordinarily close to
the great MahÄvÄkyas of the Upanishads. The declaration Tat Tvam Asi ("Thou
art That") from the ChÄndogya Upanishad proclaims that the
individual Self is none other than Brahman. Likewise, Aham BrahmÄsmi
("I am Brahman") from the Brihadaranyaka Upanishad expresses
the culmination of spiritual realisation. Mahadevi does not state these
formulations philosophically; instead, she experiences them poetically. Her
"beloved" is already within her, rendering all external search
unnecessary. Recognition replaces discovery.
The poem also resonates with the Upanishadic
concept of AntaryÄmin, the Inner Controller. According to the Brihadaranyaka
Upanishad, Brahman dwells within every being, unseen yet ever-present,
directing existence from within. Mahadevi's declaration, "You are within
me," echoes this doctrine with remarkable fidelity. The Divine is neither
distant nor external but the innermost reality of consciousness itself.
It is significant that Mahadevi avoids
describing union as an event. There is no dramatic meeting, no journey, and no
final arrival. The union already exists; only ignorance creates the illusion of
separation. This is entirely consistent with the Upanishadic understanding that
liberation (mokáı£a) is not the acquisition of something previously absent
but the removal of ignorance. One does not become Brahman; one realises that
one has never been anything else.
Her language also bears comparison with the
mystical vocabulary of the Isha Upanishad, which teaches that the Divine
pervades everything that exists. Once this truth is realised, possessiveness,
fear and alienation disappear. Mahadevi's refusal to sustain the distinction
between lover and beloved similarly dissolves all psychological boundaries. The
relationship transforms into identity.
Although Mahadevi Verma was deeply influenced
by Buddhist compassion in the later years of her life, the metaphysical
framework of this poem remains unmistakably Upanishadic rather than Buddhist.
Buddhism generally refrains from affirming an eternal Self, whereas Mahadevi
repeatedly invokes an abiding presence that resides within the individual. Her
imagery of the Infinite, the illusory boundaries of the finite self, and the
indwelling beloved all point towards the Upanishadic doctrine of the identity
of Ätman and Brahman. Compassion may illuminate the emotional texture of her
poetry, but its ontological vision is profoundly VedÄntic.
From a literary perspective, Mahadevi
accomplishes something extraordinary. Rather than presenting philosophical
doctrines in abstract language, she transforms them into lyrical experience.
The metaphysical insights of the Upanishads become living emotions expressed
through the language of love. In this respect, she stands in the long Indian
tradition that stretches from the Upanishadic seers through the Bhakti saints
to Rabindranath Tagore. Like them, she demonstrates that poetry can become a
vehicle for the highest philosophical intuition.
Ultimately, this brief lyric may be read as a
modern poetic commentary on the Upanishadic quest for Self-realisation. The
movement of the poem is not from separation to union but from the illusion of
separation to the recognition of an eternal unity that has always existed. The
beloved is not found because the beloved was never absent. The final question,"When
you are already within me, what need is there for introduction?" captures
in six simple words the essence of the Upanishadic vision: the seeker and the
sought are one. In that recognition, individuality is not annihilated but
fulfilled, and the finite self awakens to its timeless identity with the
Infinite Brahman.
( Avtar Mota )
CHINAR SHADE by
Autarmota is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.5 India License.
Based on a work at
http:\\autarmota.blogspot.com\.
