CHINAR SHADE by Autarmota is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.5 India License.
Based on a work at http:\\autarmota.blogspot.com\.
JAPAN INDIA LINKS : ANCIENT PERIOD TO MODERNITY
The connection between India and Japan is not a modern discovery born of trade or diplomacy. It is a civilisational current that began more than fifteen centuries ago and has never stopped flowing. Though separated by thousands of miles of ocean and high mountains, the two cultures have remained linked by Buddhism, by sacred scripts, by deities who changed their names but not their essence, and in recent times by art, literature and people. For Japan, India has always been Tenjiku, the heavenly land where the Buddha was born. For India, Japan has been a distant eastern brother who preserved what India herself had forgotten.
Ancient Travel Routes From India to Japan
There was no direct sea route from India to Japan in ancient times. The journey was long, dangerous and took years. It followed three main stages. First, Indian monks and scholars travelled from the ports of Bengal and Tamil Nadu to South East Asia and to Chang an, the capital of Tang China. This was the maritime Silk Route that connected Tamralipti in Bengal with Sri Vijaya in Indonesia and with the Chinese coast. Second, from China the knowledge travelled to the Korean kingdom of Baekje. Third, from Korea it crossed the sea to Japan.
Buddhism officially entered Japan in the year 552 when the King of Baekje sent a bronze Buddha image and sutras to the Japanese court. But Indian monks themselves also made the full journey. They travelled with Chinese translation teams, often learning Chinese on the way because that was the lingua franca of Asian Buddhism. The overland Silk Route through the deserts of Central Asia and the Hexi Corridor was another path. Indian ideas therefore reached Japan not in one mission but in waves of texts, images, rituals and persons over three centuries. It is remarkable that despite such distance, Sanskrit mantras and Indian monastic rules were transmitted with such accuracy.
The Great Indian Savants Who Shaped Japanese Buddhism
The most luminous symbol of direct Indian presence in Japan is Bodhisena. Bodhisena was a Brahmin scholar from South India, born in 704. He travelled through China and arrived in Japan in 736 at the invitation of Emperor Shomu. In Japan he is revered as Bodai Senna. In 752 he was given the highest honour in the Japanese Buddhist world. He consecrated and opened the eyes of the Great Buddha Vairocana at Todaiji Temple in Nara. This bronze statue remains the largest in Japan and its consecration is considered the official birth of Japanese Buddhism as a state religion. Bodhisena also founded the Kegon school and taught Sanskrit in Nara. He died in 760 and his tomb is still venerated at Ryoanji in Nara.
He was not alone. In the eighth century a group of Indian masters including Subhakarasimha, Vajrabodhi and Amoghavajra travelled to. China to transmit esoteric Buddhism. They brought with them mandalas, mantras and the Siddham alphabet. Their disciples carried this knowledge to Japan. Thus the very foundation of Japanese esoteric Buddhism bears an unmistakable Indian imprint. These savants risked shipwreck and banditry to carry knowledge and they were received in Japan as living Buddhas.
Hinduism in Japan
(Depiction of Hindu deity Krishna playing the flute in a temple constructed in 752 CE on the order of Emperor Shomu, Todai-ji Temple, Great Buddha Hall in Nara, Japan)
Some important Hindu temples in Japan are as follows:
Siddham Calligraphy - The Living Sanskrit of Japan
One of the most extraordinary survivals of this contact is Siddham calligraphy. In Japan it is called Shittan or Bonji. Siddham was the elegant script of North India from the sixth to the twelfth century. It was the script in which many Buddhist sutras were written. This script later evolved into Nagari and Devanagari in India and disappeared as a living hand around the eleventh century.
It was preserved in Japan. In 804 the young Japanese monk Kukai, later known as Kobo Daishi, travelled to Changan to study esoteric Buddhism. There he met the Kashmiri master Prajna and learned Sanskrit and Siddham. When Kukai returned he founded the Shingon school and brought the Siddham alphabet with him. Since then, for more than twelve hundred years, Shingon and Tendai monks have preserved Siddham with astonishing fidelity.
In Japan Siddham is not a museum piece. It is a living sacred art. Monks learn to write Bonji with a brush to create mantras and dharanis. The seed syllables known as bijakshara such as Om, Ah, Hum, Hrih and Kham are written in Siddham and are believed to embody the deity itself. You will find these letters carved on temple pillars, on tombstones, on mountain rocks, on wooden memorial tablets and on amulets that people carry for protection. A Japanese lay person may not read Sanskrit but recognises Bonji as holy. In this way Japan has acted as a time capsule, preserving an ancient Indian script that India herself no longer writes.
Kashmiri Savants in Japan
According to Dr Lokesh Chandra, the divine script Siddham was carried to Japan not by Chinese monks alone but by Kashmiri savants, as Kashmir then known as Sharada Desha was the world centre of Sanskrit, Tantra and Buddhist logic where Chinese pilgrims like Hiuen Tsang came to study, and the most important among them was the Kashmiri Brahmin Acharya Prajna (734-810) who went to Chang'an in 781 and in 804 taught Sanskrit and Siddham to the great Japanese monk Kobo Daishi Kukai who became his direct disciple and on returning founded the Shingon school and introduced Siddham as Shittan or Bonji, the sacred script that gives siddhi, and other masters of the Kashmiri tradition like Vajrabodhi and Amoghavajra also transmitted Mantrayana with its seed syllables Om, Hum and Hrih, and Dr Chandra notes that even the first Constitution of Japan in 604 AD was consecrated by a Sanskrit manuscript of Usnisa Vijaya Dharani in an early Siddham form, and while Siddham vanished in India in the 11th century it has been preserved alive for 1200 years in Japan at Koyasan where monks still write it with a brush on temple pillars, tombstones and amulets, so that Bonji seen in Japan today is the living handwriting of Kashmir preserved by Japan.
Japanese Medicine System and Ayurveda Link
The traditional Japanese medicine system known as Kampo has deep roots in Ayurveda brought through Buddhism, as Ayurveda called Ayurveda in Japanese texts travelled from India to China as part of Buddhist medical science and then reached Japan in the 8th century through Korean and Kashmiri monks, where the basic principle of three doshas - Vata, Pitta, Kapha became in Kampo as three essences of Ki, Ketsu and Sui, and the use of herbal decoctions, moxibustion which resembles Agnikarma, acupuncture linked to marma points, fasting and purification, seasonal diet and meditation for healing, and the ancient Japanese medical text Ishimpo written in 984 AD by Tamba Yasuyori quotes directly from Indian Ayurvedic texts like Charaka Samhita and Sushruta Samhita regarding diagnosis through pulse and tongue, use of turmeric, ginger, pepper and mercury preparations, and the Buddhist monk physician tradition of yakushi or medicine Buddha worshipped in Japan is none other than Bhaisajyaguru from India, showing that Kampo is essentially Ayurveda adapted to Japanese herbs and climate.
Japanese Way of Life - The Indian Imprint
The Japanese way of life still carries a deep Indian imprint seen in everyday habits where sitting on the floor in seiza style to eat and conduct tea ceremony mirrors the Indian baithak tradition of sitting on tatami which is like chatai, while the daily prayers at day begin and day end in Japanese homes and temples with lighting of incense, offering of flowers and food and ringing of bells is identical to Indian puja and sandhya vandana, and the use of incense or agarbatti called senko in Japan for purification and meditation came directly from Indian dhoopa ritual, and bowing with joined palms which Japanese call gassho is the same as namaste and pranam, while greetings like ohayou gozaimasu with deep bow reflect the Indian respect for elders, and other customs like taking off shoes before entering home, ritual bathing before prayer as in Japanese ofuro and Indian snana, vegetarian shojin ryori cuisine of Buddhist monks similar to sattvic bhojan, and tying sacred threads and beads of juzu mala like rudraksha mala all show how Indian Buddhist lifestyle brought by Indian savants became the Japanese way of life.
Japanese Artists Visit Shantiniketan and Kolkata :A Modern Renaissance
In the modern era this spiritual link was transformed into a cultural friendship. The centre of this was Rabindranath Tagore and his school at Shantiniketan. At the beginning of the twentieth century Tagore looked to Japan as a model of an Asian nation that had modernised without losing its soul. He visited Japan three times in 1916, 1924 and 1929 and was received with great reverence. His book Gitanjali had already been admired in Japan.
The admiration was mutual. The Japanese art historian Kakuzo Okakura, author of The Book of Tea, was a friend of Tagore. Okakura believed that Asia should have its own artistic unity distinct from the West. He sent his best disciples to Bengal. In 1916 the famous painters Yokoyama Taikan and Hishida Shunso visited the Tagore family house at Jorasanko in Kolkata. In 1916 to 1917 the artist Arai Kanpo lived in Kolkata and Shantiniketan. The Japanese wash painting technique known as nihonga, with its soft mineral colours, use of empty space and emphasis on spirit rather than photographic realism, had a profound impact on the Bengal School of Art.
Abanindranath Tagore, the founder of the Bengal School, abandoned Western oil paiinting after seeing Japanese scrolls and adopted the wash technique. Nandalal Bose, the great muralist who later decorated Shantiniketan, studied Japanese brush economy and incorporated it into his own style. The Ajanta frescoes, which Japanese artists came to copy, also became a shared heritage.
Shantiniketan in turn became a pilgrimage for Japanese intellectuals. The poet Yone Noguchi visited in 1916. The scholar and painter Setsu Asahara lived there. The archives of Rabindra Bhavana still preserve Japanese woodblock prints and scrolls gifted by these visitors. This exchange showed that the ancient religious link could be reborn as a modern artistic dialogue between two Asian civilisations.
Cinema Link - Kurosawa, Imai and Satyajit Ray
The cinema link between India and Japan is built on mutual respect between masters like Akira Kurosawa, Tadashi Imai and Satyajit Ray, where Kurosawa deeply admired Ray calling Pather Panchali as an overwhelming experience and was influenced by Indian humanism while Ray was moved by Kurosawa's Rashomon (1950) and its revolutionary use of multiple perspectives which inspired his own narrative depth, and similarly Tadashi Imai the pioneer of Japanese neo-realism known for films like Muddy Waters (1953) and Mahabharata-style humanist dramas shared Ray's concern for the poor and oppressed, and Ray openly acknowledged that he learned the power of natural light, location shooting and non-professional actors from Japanese neo-realism of Imai and Kurosawa, and this Indo-Japanese cinematic dialogue later influenced Indian parallel cinema of Shyam Benegal, Adoor Gopalakrishnan and Girish Kasaravalli who adopted Kurosawa's low-angle composition and Imai's social realism to portray village India, creating a shared aesthetic where silence speaks more than dialogue.
Haiku Adoption in India
Another fascinating chapter is the adoption of Japanese haiku in India. Haiku is a seventeen syllable form arranged in five seven five sounds. It originated in ninth century Japan and was perfected by Matsuo Basho in the seventeenth century. It depends on a season word called kigo and on the ability to suggest much more than is stated.
The first to introduce haiku to India was Tagore himself, who translated some Japanese haiku into Bengali and English. But true adoption began in the nineteen sixties and seventies. Indian poets writing in English such as R K Singh, Kala Ramesh and Satya Bhushan Verma began to write haiku seriously. In Hindi, poets like Satya Parkash Agarwal and Kamlesh Bhatt Kamal have published entire collections. Even modern Kashmiri poet Dina Nath Nadim wrote Haikus .
What attracted Indian poets was the kinship with Indian aesthetics. The concept of kigo resonates with the Indian tradition of Ritu poetry celebrated by Kalidasa in Ritusamhara and Meghaduta. The idea of dhvani, suggesting more than stating, is central to both haiku and Sanskrit poetics. The brevity of haiku suited the Indian epigrammatic tradition. Today India has a vibrant haiku movement. Groups like Triveni Haikai India and the World Haiku Association hold regular kukai meetings in the Japanese style. Many Indian schools now teach haiku writing and anthologies of Indian haiku are published every year. A Japanese form has thus taken root in Indian soil.
Modern Migration and Population
Today the profile is of highly skilled professionals. As per the Immigration Services Agency of Japan, there were 53,974 Indian nationals in December 2024 and 58,999 in December 2025. This makes Indians the twelfth largest foreign community in a country with almost four million foreign residents. Most live in Tokyo, particularly in Nishikasai in Edogawa ward which is now affectionately called Mini India, and also in Yokohama and Kobe. The community is predominantly male and works in information technology, engineering and finance. There are Indian schools, a Murugan temple in Tokyo, Sikh gurdwaras and mosques.
In 2025 India and Japan signed an Action Plan for Human Resource Exchange aiming to bring 50,000 additional skilled Indian workers to Japan by 2030 to help address the labour shortage caused by an ageing population. Cultural life is also vibrant with Diwali and Holi celebrated publicly in Tokyo parks.
Indo-Japanese Collaboration in Present Day
Present day Indo-Japanese collaboration has become a strategic partnership of mind and material extending from Bullet Train to Buddha, where Japan is building India's first Shinkansen Bullet Train between Mumbai and Ahmedabad with Japanese Shinkansen technology, Japanese companies like Suzuki, Toyota, Honda, Sony and Hitachi have made India their largest overseas base, while India provides Japan with over 50,000 highly skilled IT professionals and engineers concentrated in Mini India Nishikasai in Tokyo, and culturally the Japan Foundation, ICCR and temples like Koyasan and Nara Todaiji preserve Sanskrit and Siddham calligraphy taught by Kashmiri savants, and in 2025 both nations signed an Action Plan for Human Resource Exchange to bring 50,000 more Indians to Japan by 2030 and collaborate in semiconductors, green hydrogen, space with ISRO-JAXA joint moon mission LUPEX, and defence and Buddhism diplomacy, continuing the ancient link of Prajna and Kukai in a modern form.
Conclusion : A Continuity That Lives
The story of Indians in Japan is not a story of two separate phases, ancient and modern, but of one unbroken continuity. In the eighth century an Indian monk consecrated the Great Buddha of Nara. In the ninth century an Indian script found a permanent home in Japanese temples. In the twentieth century Japanese painters came to Bengal to learn how to paint emptiness and Indian poets learned from Japan how to capture a whole season in three lines.
What makes this relationship unique in world history is that Japan did not merely borrow from India and move on. It preserved. While Siddham disappeared from the land of its birth, it remained alive on the brush of a Shingon monk. While many Hindu deities lost their public worship in their original context, they continued to receive offerings in Japan as Benzaiten and Daikokuten. In that sense Japan became a cultural archive of ancient India.
Today the wheel has turned full circle. The children of those who once travelled for years by ship and desert to carry a manuscript now travel in a few hours by air to write software in Tokyo. The little India of Nishikasai, with its spice shops and temples, is the newest layer on a foundation that is fifteen hundred years old. From sacred script to software code, the journey of Indians in Japan shows that true cultural exchange does not erase identity. It allows two civilisations to remain distinct and yet recognise themselves in each other.
( Avtar Mota)
(1)
"Abdulla Khan invaded and occupied Kashmir in 1747 A.D. He introduced a queer and irksome administration. There arose a great hue and cry among the people against his illegal exactions his high-handed measures and the deceit and pillage which were practised under his rule. Treasure and secreted wealth of gold and silver, stores of carpets and silver and golden articles, which the Moghuls had maintained in the country, were taken possession by him for his personal use. He exacted heavy fines and indemnities from the big merchants and respectable gentry of the country. Once some of his minions branded a leading person of the country with red-hot sword. Unable to bear the torture, this man succumbed to his injuries. Abdulla Khan richly rewarded the perpetrators of this cruelty. Quazi Khan, another respectable citizen, was forced to pay a fine of one lakh of rupees and yet his son was subjected to inhuman harassment. Unable to stand this brutality, the young man sought escape in suicide and jumping from the Zainakadal bridge, drowned himself in the River Jhelum."
(2)
"After Amir Khan, Haji Karimdad Khan Bamzai came at the head of the Government of Kashmir in 1776. He appointed Mir Fazil Kant in charge of revenue and administrative work. After a few months he accused Kant of neglecting the collection of revenue and ordered his execution. Along with this all the members of the Kant tribe were destroyed. Karimdad Khan also got displeased with Tarkuli Khan and got him executed too. A rope was tied to his feet and he was kept suspended by the feet under the Habakadal bridge till he died.
Throughout the reign of Karimdad Khan the entire county remained plunged in absolute misery and fear. During this period everybody, high or low, rich or poor, was fleeced of all he possessed. He ruined the chastity of a thousand girls of both Hindu and Muslim communities and thus ruined their lives for ever. He exacted such heavy taxes and duties from Mansabdars and Jagirdars, as exceed by far the value of their possessions. All these people were reduced to utter penury. Many of them chose to dispose of their possessions and migrate from the country. He appointed the most heartless people to collect taxes from the people. Heavy fruit tax was imposed on zamindars. Since they could not meet this heavy demand, they cut down their fruit trees and sold the wood to meet the demand of the Government. In this way all the beautiful gardens in the city and rural areas, and particularly those which had been planted by the Moghuls around the Dal Lake, were denuded of all fruit trees. The lambardars and nobility were reduced to dust by the heavy exactions made from them by the Subedar. It is said that one of the tax collectors named, Aslam Harkara, was blind in both eyes, and so he sued to go in a Palki from place to place to collect taxes. He treated the people most cruelly. People were reduced to such destitution that, robbed of their hearths and homes, they had to lie on the bare ground under the open sky."
(3)
"At this time no less than 20,00,000 rupees are extracted by the Afghan Governor who, if his tribute be not regularly remitted to Court, is allowed to execute with impunity every act of violence. This extreme rigour has sensibly affected the department and manners of the Kashmirians who shrink with dread from the Afghan oppression and are fearful of making any display of opulence........ During my stay in Kashmir, I often withnessed the harsh treatment which the common people received at the hands of their masters who rarely issued an order without a blow of the side of their hatchet, common weapon of the Afghans, and used by them in war as a battle-axe"......Report of Forster (1783 )
( Avtar Mota )
Hindus in Pakistan: A Community Under
Sustained Pressure
At
the time of Partition in 1947, Hindus formed a very substantial minority in
West Pakistan. Estimates vary between 15 and 22 per cent depending on whether
Scheduled Castes are included and whether the population of East Pakistan is
excluded from the calculation. In Sindh, Hindus were about 26 per cent of the
population and dominated commerce, education and the professions in towns such
as Karachi, Hyderabad, Sukkur, Shikarpur and Larkana. In Punjab, cities like
Lahore and Multan had large Hindu merchant and professional classes. In
Balochistan, Hindus formed the principal trading community in Quetta and Kalat.
In Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, though smaller in number, Hindus were present as traders
and moneylenders.
The
events of Partition led to large-scale migration. While many Muslims moved from
India to Pakistan, an even larger number of Hindus and Sikhs moved from
Pakistan to India. Yet a considerable Hindu population chose to remain,
reassured by the assurances given by Muhammad Ali Jinnah on 11 August 1947 that
religion would have nothing to do with the business of the state and that all
citizens would be equal.
Present Population
According
to the 7th Population and Housing Census of Pakistan conducted in 2023 and
released in 2024, the position is as follows.
The
total population of Pakistan was recorded as 240.45 million. The number of
persons recorded as Hindu Jati was 3,867,729, which is 1.61 per cent of the
population. The number recorded as Scheduled Castes was 1,349,487, which is 0.56
per cent. Taken together, the total Hindu population is 5,217,216, which is 2.17 per
cent of the total population. This makes Hindus the largest non-Muslim
community in Pakistan. A second set of tables released by the Pakistan Bureau
of Statistics that counts only non-Muslim citizens shows a slightly lower Hindu
Jati figure, but the combined total remains above five million. The community
has increased in absolute numbers from 3.5 million in 2017 to about 3.8 to 5.2
million in 2023 depending on classification, but its share in the total
population has declined from 1.73 per cent to 1.61 per cent for Hindu Jati. This
is the official position. Independent community organisations such as the
Pakistan Hindu Council claim the actual number may be higher as many low caste
Hindus are undercounted.
Population declining rapidly
Area-wise Spread in Pakistan
Sindh
contains about 94 per cent of all Hindus in Pakistan. The 2023 census recorded
4,901,107 Hindus in Sindh, which is 8.81 per cent of the provincial population.
Districts such as Umerkot where Hindus are over 50 per cent, Tharparkar where
they are about 45 per cent, Mirpurkhas, Sanghar, Badin, Thatta and Tando
Allahyar have very high concentrations. In urban Sindh, Hyderabad, Karachi and
Sukkur still have sizeable Hindu populations. Punjab contains about 249,716
Hindus, which is only 0.2 per cent of the province. Most live in Rahim Yar Khan,
Bahawalpur, Multan and Lahore. Balochistan contains 59,107 Hindus, which is 0.41
per cent, concentrated in Quetta, Kalat, Lasbela near Hinglaj and Sibi. Khyber
Pakhtunkhwa contains 6,104 Hindus, which is 0.02 per cent, mostly in Peshawar
and Bannu.
Abduction and Forcible Conversion of Hindu Girls
The method is similar in most cases. A girl goes missing on the way to school or fields. A few days later, a certificate of conversion and a Nikahnama appear from a seminary. Police often refuse to register a First Information Report or accept the conversion documents as proof of voluntary marriage. The courts often send the girl to a shelter but accept her statement given under obvious pressure. The case of Mehak Kumari in Jacobabad, Reena and Raveena in Ghotki, and Arti Kumari in Daharki received national attention but ended without the girls returning to their families. The law that would set 18 as the minimum age for conversion and marriage has been repeatedly blocked in the Sindh Assembly after opposition from religious parties. For the community, this creates constant fear and is a major driver of migration.
Regular Incidents of Desecration of Religious Places and Demolition /Occupation of Religious Places
Pakistan
had about 428 Hindu temples at independence according to the All Pakistan Hindu
Rights Movement. By the early 2000s, surveys by the same organisation found
that only about 20 were functioning and the rest had been encroached upon, leased or
demolished. Temples suffer from three forms of loss. First, occupation by land
mafia or municipal bodies. The Shri Krishna Mandir in Karachi, Shri Varun Dev
Temple on Manora Island, and several temples in Hyderabad and Mirpurkhas are
examples of properties leased or occupied. Second, demolition during mob
violence. Third, administrative takeover by the Evacuee Trust Property Board, which was meant to protect minority property but is widely accused of selling
or leasing it. According to the Sustainable Development Policy Institute, over
70 per cent of Hindu-owned religious property in Sindh is under encroachment.
Even Hinglaj Mata Mandir, the most sacred Shakti Peetha, has faced encroachment
attempts on its surrounding lands. Regular desecration occurs. Idols are broken
in Tharparkar, temple walls are defaced, and flags are burnt. The Pakistan
Hindu Council recorded 12 incidents of temple vandalism in 2023 alone.
Attacks after Babri Mosque Demolition
in India
The
demolition of the Babri Mosque in Ayodhya on 6 December 1992 triggered a wave
of retaliatory attacks on Hindus in Pakistan that is still remembered as a
turning point. According to reports in Dawn and international agencies, more
than 30 temples were attacked in one week in December 1992. In Lahore, Karachi,
Peshawar, Quetta and Sindh, mobs destroyed temples, homes and shops. The Jain
Temple in Lahore, the Ram Mandir in Karachi and several temples in Sukkur and
Hyderabad were burnt. In many cases, police stood by. Community elders state
that many Hindu families who had stayed through 1947 and 1965 finally left
Pakistan after 1992. The event created a precedent that any communal incident
in India would result in collective punishment for Hindus in Pakistan. Similar
though smaller waves occurred after the Gujarat riots in 2002 and after
occasional statements about Kashmir.
Many Hindus living by hiding identity
In
urban centres outside interior Sindh, many Hindus hide their religious identity
to obtain work, rent and education. In Punjab and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, it is
common for Hindus to use Muslim-sounding names in business, to avoid wearing
tilak or bindi, and to not disclose their religion to neighbours. In Karachi,
many professional Hindus report that they do not declare their religion on job
applications because of automatic rejection. In the formal sector, national
identity cards require religion, but in informal social settings, concealment
is a survival strategy. Scheduled Caste Hindus, who form a large part of the
Hindu population and work as bonded labourers in Sindh, often have no option to
hide and have no protection to assert identity.
Lack of equal employment opportunities
The
Constitution of Pakistan guarantees equality in Articles 25 and 27, but ground
reality shows systematic exclusion. Hindus are largely absent from the army
officer cadre, the judiciary, foreign service, police leadership and senior
bureaucracy. In Sindh, where Hindus are nearly nine per cent, their
representation in provincial government jobs is less than one per cent
according to a 2021 study by the Centre for Social Justice. Most Hindus are
confined to low-paying occupations. In Tharparkar and Umerkot, the majority
work as Hari or bonded farm labourers. In urban areas, many work in sanitation,
a sector where Muslims generally do not work. The Scheduled Caste Hindus are
particularly trapped in debt bondage despite laws banning it. The five per cent
quota for minorities in government jobs exists on paper but is rarely
implemented. Advertisements often show only sanitation jobs reserved for non-Muslims,
reinforcing stigma.
Economic Plight
The
economic condition of Pakistani Hindus is among the weakest of any community in
the country. According to a survey by the Pakistan Institute of Labour
Education and Research, over 60 per cent of Hindu households in Tharparkar live
below the poverty line compared to a national average of about 25 per cent.
Literacy among Hindu women in interior Sindh is under 10 per cent. Access to
health care is minimal. Many families own no land despite tilling land for
generations as bonded labourers. The bonded labour system, known as peshgi,
keeps families in perpetual debt. When a child falls ill, a loan is taken from
the landlord, and the family must work to repay it at interest rates that never
allow repayment. In urban areas, lack of property rights and eviction from
temple-associated lands have pushed many families into katchi abadis or slums.
Neglect From Pakistani Intellectuals
Even the liberal conscience of Pakistan appears, at times, to have confronted the question of minorities more readily in private reflection than in sustained public literary discourse. Faiz Ahmed Faiz, Ahmad Faraz, Habib Jalib, Intizar Husain and many other major writers wrote with extraordinary force about oppression, dictatorship, poverty, Partition and injustice. Yet the specific condition of Pakistan's Hindu and other non Muslim minorities rarely became a sustained subject of their major literary work. Their progressive vocabulary was largely organised around class struggle, imperialism, democracy, authoritarianism and resistance to state power. This is also a fact that never ever did the progressive writers speak anything hostile about the minorities; indeed, Faiz and Jalib were themselves powerful opponents of the state's coercive Islamisation. But there remained a significant neglect around the 'particular experiences of Hindus: dispossession, attacks on temples, forced conversions, discrimination and the gradual shrinking of their social and cultural space. The question is not simply why individual writers failed to address every injustice. It is whether sustained attention to Hindu suffering would have compelled the progressive intelligentsia to examine a more uncomfortable question: the relationship between Pakistan's religiously defined national identity and the unequal position of those who did not belong to this identity. Such an examination could have challenged assumptions embedded in the very idea of Pakistan, and perhaps this explains, at least in part, why the subject remained peripheral to much of its progressive literary discourse. This also creates an important intellectual paradox: a literary tradition that spoke in the language of universal humanism gave comparatively little sustained attention to one of Pakistan's most vulnerable minorities.
Habib Jalib, the poet of resistance, challenged every dictator but rarely wrote on minority persecution as a specific category. Intizar Husain was different in his recovery of Hindu and Buddhist myths and the composite cultural memory of pre-Partition India. His fiction mourns the loss of that shared heritage, and he accepted in interviews that minorities have been rendered invisible in the national narrative. But he largely addressed civilisational loss and Partition rather than the contemporary condition of Pakistani Hindus, such as abduction of girls, forced conversions, bonded labour in Tharparkar, attacks on religious places, and shrinking of space for them in education and employment.
This pattern continues among contemporary liberal writers, columnists and television commentators. Off the record, they may admit that forced conversions are real, that temple encroachment is wrong and that textbooks need revision, yet when it comes to the pen, self-censorship operates. Fear of backlash from religious groups, fear of being labelled as anti-Pakistan or pro-India, the pressure of state ideology and the concern that speaking for Hindus will alienate the majority readership all combine to produce silence. The result is a double tragedy. The community is not only denied justice by the state, it is also denied solidarity in literature. The very writers who could have immortalised a Thari Hindu woman searching for her abducted daughter or a priest guarding a ruined shrine in Hyderabad have chosen caution. Their private admission confirms that the neglect is known and recognised at the highest levels of conscience, but their public omission ensures that the neglect continues without literary record or moral challenge.
In India, the leading Hindu literary conscience has never hidden behind private sympathy ; it has spoken, written, marched and been jailed. Munshi Premchand wrote Karbala; Bhisham Sahni wrote Tamas indicting his own community's communalism; Krishan Chander, a Hindu writing in Urdu, defended Urdu and Muslim life in Peshawar Express; Harishankar Parsai mocked anti Muslim bigotry; Phanishwar Nath Renu celebrated syncretism in Maila Anchal; Amrita Pritam made Muslim suffering central in Pinjar; Mahadevi Verma, Nirala and Maithilisharan Gupt wrote elegies on Karbala and Muslim heritage; Mahashweta Devi stood physically with Muslim weavers and riot victims in Gujarat; Girish Karnad staged Tughlaq to reclaim Muslim history for India and protested on streets; Vijay Tendulkar denounced majoritarian violence; Mridula Garg, Alka Saraogi, Uday Prakash, Namvar Singh, Ashok Vajpeyi and K. Satchidanandan signed petitions, filed cases and faced trolling for Muslims. This is open, public, documented solidarity at personal cost. The contrast with Pakistan could not be sharper. Stalwart Pakistani intellectuals and their contemporary liberal heirs admitted in drawing rooms that Hindus were dispossessed, temples encroached, and girls abducted, yet their major works avoided the specific plight of Pakistani Hindus. Their progressivism interrogated class, dictatorship and imperialism, but flinched before the religious basis of the state that made Hindus unequal. One tradition risked its popularity for the minority, the other preserved its popularity by abandoning it. That difference explains why Indian secularism retained a living archive of intercession, while Pakistani liberalism left its Hindus only polite silence and undocumented enduring pity.
When Intellectuals Fell Silent, Some Conscience Keepers Spoke
It is only through newspapers like Dawn, a handful of journalists committed to truth, and the Pakistan Human Rights Commission that the stories of atrocities against religious minorities in general and Hindus in particular were made public. Where the literary intelligentsia chose silence, some conscience keepers in journalism rose to the call of humanity, even under threats and unpopularity.
Dawn, despite being branded as liberal and anti-national, consistently reported temple desecrations, forced conversions and bonded labour. Columnists like Ardeshir Cowasjee, the old Parsi conscience of Karachi, wrote for decades about encroached temple lands and Evacuee Trust Property Board corruption when no Muslim intellectual would touch the subject. I.A. Rehman, the heart of the Human Rights Commission of Pakistan, spent a lifetime documenting the abduction of Hindu girls in Sindh. Asma Jahangir defended Hindu families in courts and called forced conversions what they were, without euphemism. Zohra Yusuf, Harris Khalique, Beena Sarwar, Marvi Sirmed, and Cyril Almeida reported from Tharparkar, Umerkot and Ghotki, naming victims like Reena, Raveena and Mehak Kumari when police refused to register FIRs. Zia ur Rehman prepared a detailed report on the Hindu Exodus from Sindh.
The Human Rights Commission of Pakistan provided the humanism that literature denied. Under chairs like Asma Jahangir, I.A. Rehman and Hina Jilani, its annual reports recorded what novelists would not: over a thousand Hindu and Christian girls forcibly converted every year, seventy per cent of Hindu religious property encroached, and thousands migrating to India. Its fact-finding missions travelled to interior Sindh, sat with Dalit haris, and published testimonies at great personal risk. These journalists and rights defenders proved that courage was possible, but their isolation also proved how deep the silence was. They were abused, threatened with blasphemy charges and labelled traitors, yet they kept the record alive, ensuring that when history finally judges Pakistan today, it cannot claim it did not know.
Lip Sympathy From Politicians
Political
representation exists but is seen as tokenism. There are 10 reserved seats for non-Muslims
in the National Assembly. These are allocated by parties, not directly elected,
so members are accountable to party leadership rather than the community.
Similar reserved seats exist in provincial assemblies. Politicians visit
temples during Diwali and Holi, issue statements condemning abductions, and
promise commissions. Yet legislation to criminalise forced conversion has been
blocked repeatedly. The Hindu Marriage Act was passed in 2017 after 70 years of
demand, but its implementation remains poor. Many union councils still do not
register Hindu marriages, which makes it easier to claim that a converted girl
was previously unmarried. After every abduction or temple attack, ministers
promise inquiry and compensation, but convictions are rare. The community
therefore describes political attention as lip service.
Exclusion From History Books
Pakistan
Studies textbooks, which are compulsory, give almost no space to the Hindu past
of the region or to the contribution of Hindus after independence. The Indus
Valley Civilisation is described with minimal reference to its continuity with
Hindu traditions. The Hindu Shahi dynasty that ruled the northwest for
centuries, the development of Sindhi culture by Hindu scholars, and the role of
Hindu philanthropists like Jamshed Mehta, the first mayor of Karachi, are
omitted. Minorities appear in textbooks only as problems or as examples of
tolerance by Muslim rulers. The result is that generations of students grow up without
knowing that Hindus were original inhabitants and that temples like Hinglaj,
Katas Raj and Prahladpuri are indigenous heritage. This erasure, educators
argue, normalises discrimination and makes it difficult for Hindu children to
feel belonging.
Alarming Human Rights Report on Hindus
Every
major human rights report in the last decade has flagged the Hindu situation. The
United States Commission on International Religious Freedom has recommended
Pakistan as a Country of Particular Concern. The US State Department
International Religious Freedom Report notes forced conversion, temple attacks
and discrimination. The Human Rights Commission of Pakistan's annual reports list
forced conversion, bonded labour and extrajudicial discrimination against
Hindus as major concerns. Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch have
documented that blasphemy laws, though more often used against Muslims, create
a climate of fear for Hindus as well, with accusations sometimes used to settle
land disputes.
The
most alarming trend noted in 2023 and 2024 reports is the increase in out-migration due to insecurity. The Human Rights Commission of Pakistan reported
that over 5000 Hindus migrated from Sindh to India in 2022 and 2023 alone. The
community that once formed the commercial and intellectual elite of Sindh and
that worshipped at the ancient shrines of Hinglaj and Katas Raj now faces a
struggle for physical security, legal equality and cultural survival.
Conclusion
The
story of Hindus in Pakistan is the story of a community that is indigenous to
the land, that shared in its ancient civilisation, that chose to remain at
independence, and that has since been reduced from a substantial minority to a
vulnerable and geographically concentrated fragment.
This
is not a communal issue alone. It is a test of the constitutional promise made
by the founder of Pakistan that religion would have nothing to do with the
business of the state and that minorities would be equal citizens. The
Constitution of Pakistan provides for equality, freedom of religion and
protection of minorities, but implementation remains weak.
Will the government enact a credible law against forced
conversion that sets eighteen as the minimum age and provides for independent
verification of consent? Will the government restore and protect the evacuee trust
properties and prosecute those who desecrate temples? Will the government implement the much-needed employment quotas in a dignified manner and ensure inclusion of the
true history of Sindh and Punjab in textbooks so that Hindu children can see
themselves as equal sons and daughters of the soil? Without such steps, the
present trend points towards further ghettoisation in interior Sindh and
continued outmigration of those who can leave. The loss will not be only for
Hindus. Pakistan also risks losing a part of its own civilisational heritage
when the Hindu past of the country is neglected or allowed to disappear.
Hinglaj Mata, Katas Raj and the old temples of Karachi, Lahore, Sindh, Punjab
and Balochistan did not become Indian monuments after 1947. They remained
within the territory of Pakistan and consequently became part of the historical
landscape of the new state. Their antiquity belongs to the history of the land
itself, not to the political boundaries created by Partition. To preserve them
is therefore not to preserve someone else’s heritage; it is to preserve a part
of Pakistan’s own plural cultural past. When such sites are destroyed,
appropriated, abandoned or removed from public memory, Pakistan loses not
merely places of worship belonging to a minority but chapters of its own
historical inheritance.
(
Avtar Mota )
SOURCES AND REFERENCES