Horses in India: A Civilisational
Memory Older Than Empire
From time to time, one encounters the sweeping
claim that horses were unknown to Indian rulers until they were introduced by
the Mughals from Central Asia. Such assertions, often presented with academic
confidence, collapse under even moderate scrutiny. They betray not only a
shallow reading of Indian sources but also a troubling disconnect from
archaeology, classical literature, military history, and comparative
civilisational studies.
The horse is not a late intruder into Indian
civilisation. It is deeply embedded in India’s religious imagination, political
vocabulary, military organisation, ritual life, and artistic symbolism from the
earliest layers of recorded memory. To suggest that Indian kings first
encountered the horse in the Mughal period is not merely inaccurate — it erases
millennia of textual, cultural, and historical evidence.
The Horse in Sacred Memory
Civilisations remember what matters to them.
In India, the horse occupies a place of rare symbolic dignity.
In ancient mythology, the celestial horse
Uchchaihshravas emerged during the Samudra Manthan — the cosmic churning of the
ocean. This magnificent white, seven-headed horse later became associated with
Indra, king of the gods. The story is not an incidental fable; it reflects an
already established cultural familiarity with the horse as a royal and divine
creature.
The Sanskrit word ashva (horse) appears
abundantly in Vedic literature. It is classified among gramya pashu —
domestic animals — in texts such as the Vayu Purana, indicating that it
was understood as part of human society, not as some unknown exotic novelty.
Surya, the Sun God, rides across the heavens
in a chariot drawn by seven horses named after the seven Vedic metres: Gayatri,
Brihati, Ushnik, Jagati, Trishtubh, Anushtubh, and Pankti. The symbolism is
layered: the horse represents rhythm, motion, vitality, and cosmic order. The
daily journey of the sun itself is imagined through equine imagery.
In the Vedas, the horse frequently symbolises
energy, speed, virility, and the cyclical passage of time. The Ashvamedha-yajna, the royal horse sacrifice, was among the most elaborate political-ritual
ceremonies of ancient India. It was not the ritual of a civilisation unfamiliar
with horses; rather, it was the supreme assertion of imperial sovereignty. The
wandering sacrificial horse symbolised territorial authority. Kings who
performed the Ashvamedha were declaring political supremacy across regions.
Lord Vishnu assumed the Hayagriva avatar —
with a horse’s head — to restore the Vedas from demonic forces. The Ashvini
Kumaras, twin divine physicians, derive their name from ashva and are
symbolised by a horse’s head. Ashvini Nakshatra, the first among
the twenty-seven lunar mansions in Vedic astrology, carries equine symbolism. Ashvatthama
of the Mahabharata was so named because he cried like a horse at
birth.
Panchamukha Hanuman is depicted, in certain traditions, with a horse
face among his five forms.
One may dismiss mythology as allegory, but
allegory presupposes familiarity. No civilisation weaves elaborate cosmology
around an animal it does not know.
Textual and Ritual Evidence
Moving beyond mythology, the horse is central
to Vedic ritual and political vocabulary. The Rigveda contains numerous
references to horses, chariots, and cavalry dynamics. The very term rajan
(king) in the Vedic world is closely associated with chariot warfare. The
horse-drawn chariot was a principal instrument of early Indo-Indian polity.
The Ashvamedha, mentioned extensively
in the Yajurveda and Brahmana
texts, was performed by kings seeking imperial recognition. This was not mere
symbolism; it required trained cavalry, stable management, and logistical
sophistication.
The Mahabharata offers detailed
depictions of chariot warfare, cavalry movements, and equestrian skill. Nakula,
one of the Pandavas, was renowned for his mastery of Ashva-shastra, the science of horse training and care. The Shalihotra Samhita, an ancient
Sanskrit text attributed to the sage Shalihotra (dated by some scholars to the
early centuries BCE), is among the earliest veterinary treatises in the world
and deals extensively with horse medicine. Such a text cannot exist in a culture ignorant of horses.
The Arthashastra of Kautilya (4th century BCE)
discusses state administration of cavalry units, horse inspectors, breeding,
training, and trade regulation. It refers to designated officers for cavalry
management, indicating an institutionalised equine economy.
Archaeological and Foreign Testimony
While debates persist over the presence of
horses in the earliest phases of the Indus-Saraswati civilisation,
evidence of horses in the subcontinent from the later Vedic period onward is
undisputed. Excavations at sites such as
Surkotada in Gujarat have yielded equine remains that some archaeologists
identify as domesticated horse bones. Though interpretations differ, what is
beyond doubt is the widespread presence of horses in India well before medieval
times.
The Greek ambassador Megasthenes, who visited the court of Chandragupta Maurya in the
4th century BCE, described the Mauryan military establishment, including its
cavalry divisions and officials overseeing horse management. His account notes
that the Mauryan army was organised
into infantry, cavalry, chariots, and elephants. This alone predates the Mughal
period by nearly eighteen centuries.
Ashokan pillars from the 3rd century BCE
feature animal capitals, including horses, indicating symbolic prominence.
Gupta emperor Samudragupta performed
the Ashvamedha and issued gold coins depicting the sacrificial horse tied to a yupa (sacrificial post). These
coins remain numismatic evidence of equine ritual centrality.
Chandragupta
II (Vikramaditya)
maintained powerful cavalry forces that were instrumental in defeating the Saka rulers. The Gupta military system
relied heavily on mobile horse units to expand and defend the empire.
Military Backbone of Indian Kingdoms
Throughout ancient and medieval India, cavalry
formed the backbone of royal power.
The Bharata–Puru clans of the Rigvedic era were
skilled in horse-drawn warfare. King
Dasharatha of Ayodhya, whose
name literally implies mastery over ten chariots, commanded elite horse-driven
units. Sri Rama’s campaigns include references to horse-drawn chariots and
organised military divisions.
Bimbisara and Ajatashatru of Magadha employed cavalry alongside
infantry and elephants. The Mauryan Empire institutionalised cavalry
administration. The Guptas
strengthened it further.
In later centuries, Rajput rulers built
reputations around elite horse contingents. Maharana Pratap’s legendary horse, Chetak, became an enduring symbol of loyalty and valour.
Prithviraj Chauhan’s military strategies relied significantly on swift cavalry
manoeuvres.
In southern India, Raja Raja Chola I and later Chola emperors maintained state cavalry
units in addition to their naval strength. The Vijayanagara Empire,
especially under Krishnadevaraya,
possessed heavy cavalry forces, often supplemented by imports but firmly
integrated into indigenous military structures.
Yes, horses were imported at various times —
Arabian, Central Asian, and Persian breeds were prized for endurance and size.
But trade in superior breeds does not imply civilisational ignorance. Rome
imported horses; so did China. No serious historian argues that those
civilisations lacked horses before the import trade intensified.
The Mughal Factor: Expansion, Not
Introduction
What the Mughals did bring was an enhanced
cavalry organisation influenced by Central Asian steppe traditions. They
expanded mounted warfare techniques, such as massed cavalry charges and the use
of the composite bow on horseback. But expansion is not introduction.
By the time Babur entered India in 1526,
equestrian warfare in India was already ancient. The Delhi Sultanate, preceding
the Mughals, depended heavily on cavalry. Rajput armies were seasoned horsemen.
Southern kingdoms deployed cavalry in inter-dynastic conflicts. The idea that
horses arrived only with the Mughals is chronologically untenable.
Trade, Ecology, and Adaptation
Indeed, the Indian climate is not
uniformly ideal for breeding large war horses compared to Central Asia’s
steppes. Consequently, Indian polities often imported horses from Arabia,
Persia, and Central Asia to supplement local breeds. Coastal trade networks, especially
through Gujarat, Sindh, and the Coromandel coast, facilitated vibrant horse
markets.
But this fact underscores commercial
sophistication, not ignorance. Kingdoms that import the finest Arabian horses
do so because they already possess cavalry traditions and seek excellence.
Civilisational Continuity
The Indian relationship with the horse is
civilisational, not episodic. It spans:
- Vedic hymns
- Royal
rituals like the Ashvamedha
- Political
treatises like the Arthashastra
- Veterinary
science in the Shalihotra Samhita
- Mauryan and
Gupta inscriptions
- Rajput
chronicles
- Chola and Vijayanagara military systems
- Iconography,
astrology, and devotional symbolism
No serious survey of Indian sources, religious,
literary, political, or archaeological, supports the theory of Mughal-era
introduction.
Conclusion
The horse gallops through the Indian
imagination from the earliest hymns of the Rigveda to the battlefields of
Rajputana. It pulls the chariot of Surya, embodies sovereign authority in the
Ashvamedha, appears on imperial coins, fills the stables of Mauryas and Guptas,
and charges alongside warriors across centuries.
To claim that Indian kings knew nothing of
horses before the Mughals is to ignore sacred texts, political treatises,
classical epics, foreign travellers’ accounts, numismatic evidence, military
records, and artistic depictions. History demands rigour. Civilisations deserve
fairness.
(Avtar Mota )
Based on a work at http:\\autarmota.blogspot.com\.
.jpg)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.