('The Stranger' Portrait of Albert Camus by an artist )
BHAGWAD GITA AND SOME CHARACTERS IN THE NOVELS OF ALBERT
CAMUS
Certain
characters in the novels of Albert Camus embody attitudes that can be
meaningfully compared to the central teaching of the Bhagavad Gita, namely,
action without attachment (nishkama
karma), especially when considered in light of the indirect
intellectual influence of his teacher cum friend Jean Grenier, who was familiar with and receptive to Indian
philosophical ideas. The presence of such ideas within his formative
intellectual environment allows for a plausible line of influence, not as
direct borrowing but as a philosophical resonance shaping his ethical
imagination. The closest figure in this regard is Meursault from ‘The Stranger’.
Meursault lives without appeal to higher meaning, social conventions, or
future-oriented justification; he acts, experiences, and accepts consequences
with a stark immediacy. Although this is not the Gita’s disciplined and
consciously realised detachment grounded in a cosmic order, there remains a
structural similarity in his indifference to outcomes and external judgement.
The crucial distinction, however, lies in the foundation: in the Gita,
detachment emerges from insight into eternal reality as revealed by Sri Krishna, whereas Meursault’s detachment
arises from the absence of such metaphysical belief, rendering it an expression
of existential clarity rather than spiritual knowledge.
A
more compelling parallel may be found in Dr
Rieux from The Plague, whose conduct more closely approximates the Gita’s
ethic of duty. Rieux persists in treating the sick and resisting the plague
despite knowing that suffering cannot be definitively overcome and that no
ultimate victory is assured. His action is sustained not by hope of success or
divine sanction, but by a sense of obligation intrinsic to the human condition.
This bears a striking resemblance to the Gita’s teaching to Arjuna: to act according to one’s duty
without attachment to the fruits of action. Given that such an ethical posture
is relatively uncommon in the Western tradition outside certain Stoic strands,
its appearance in Camus, mediated through an intellectual milieu shaped in part
by figures like Jean Grenier, strengthens the case for an affinity with
Gita-like thought. Finally, the figure of Sisyphus in The Myth of Sisyphus
provides a symbolic culmination of this pattern. His endless labour, undertaken
without hope of completion, reflects action entirely stripped of expectation,
echoing in abstract form the Gita’s ideal of non-attached action. Yet, where
the Gita resolves this discipline into transcendence and liberation, Camus
deliberately refuses such closure, insisting instead upon immanence and defiant
acceptance. Thus, while it would be overstated to claim direct doctrinal
influence, the convergence of these character-types, combined with Camus’s
intellectual proximity to thinkers acquainted with Indian philosophy, allows
one to argue that the Bhagavad Gita forms part of the wider, indirect
background against which his vision of action, detachment, and endurance takes
shape.
Camus’s teacher and early mentor at the University of Algiers, Prof Jean Grenier, was a figure of considerable intellectual breadth, whose writings reveal a sustained engagement with non-Western traditions, including Indian philosophy. In works such as Les Îles, Grenier reflects upon themes of detachment, inwardness, and the search for a form of truth that lies beyond the confines of conventional Western rationalism. His attraction to the Gita was not philological or systematic in the academic sense, but philosophical and existential: he was drawn to its emphasis on inner clarity, the renunciation of ego, and the ideal of action performed without attachment to its fruits, an ethic that resonated with his own contemplative disposition.
(Avtar Mota )
Based on a work at http:\\autarmota.blogspot.com\.


No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.