ALBERT CAMUS : FROM GRENIER TO DOSTOEVSKY TO BHAGAVAD GITA

                                        

FROM GRENIER TO DOSTOEVSKY TO BHAGAVAD GITA

Albert Camus came to Dostoevsky through Jean Grenier, his teacher and mentor in Algiers. It was Grenier who first pressed the Russian master into Camus’s hands, not as literature, but as a mirror. In doing so he set a young philosopher on a road that led straight into the centre of moral crisis. Dostoevsky did not write about ideas. He wrote about men being devoured by them. Raskolnikov murders with a theory. Ivan Karamazov argues God out of existence and then collapses under the weight of it. The Underground Man thinks himself into paralysis. Grenier saw that Camus was fighting the same war, and he gave him the fiercest witness to it.Jean Grenier taught philosophy at the University  of Algiers from 1933–1936. However he had met Jean Grenier at the Grand  Lycee d' Alger  when he was  17-year-old boy. 

Yet Dostoevsky was not inventing this crisis. He was translating it, in Russian and in blood, from a text written two and a half thousand years earlier. On the field of Kurukshetra, Sri Krishna speaks to Arjuna at the exact moment when thought has made action impossible. “You have a right to action, not to the fruits of action.” It is a command to move, even when the mind is torn, even when the outcome is unknown. Dostoevsky gives the same command in a different tongue through Father Zosima: “Love all of God’s creation, the whole and every grain of sand in it. Love every leaf, every ray of God’s light.”Both reject the seduction of endless analysis. Both demand that we step out of the head and into the world.

The agreement between them is deeper than morality. It is metaphysical. The Gita declares, “The soul is neither born, nor does it die… it is eternal.”Dostoevsky insists, “I am convinced that there are no accidental meetings of people. We are brought together only to do what we have to do.” Both treat suffering not as punishment but as purification. Both distinguish between jnana ; knowledge that puffs up  and vijnana, wisdom that is lived. Intellect alone, they warn, leads to Ivan’s “everything is permitted.” Only duty, bound to love, leads back to life.

Camus inherited that line and carried it into the 20th century. He found no God in the heavens and no meaning handed down. He found instead the absurd: a world that does not answer us. And yet he did not surrender to it. In The Myth of Sisyphus, he writes, “One must imagine Sisyphus happy.” It is Karma without metaphysics. It is the Gita’s teaching stripped to its bone: the hill is pointless, the stone will fall, but you rise and push it anyway. Not for reward. Not for applause. But because to refuse is to die inside.

From Grenier to Dostoevsky to the Bhagavad Gita, the thread does not break. A teacher gives a book. A novelist exposes the wound. An ancient scripture gives the cure. Reason alone destroys. Doubt alone suffocates. Only action, rooted in duty and love, sets you free. The question has not changed in 2,500 years. Only the names have. 

Algiers itself was Camus’s other teacher. At the University of Algiers from 1933 to 1936, Grenier was his anchor, but Camus also studied with classicists like Jean Hytier and Jacques Heurgon, and earned his degree writing on Greek thought and Christian metaphysics. Beyond the lecture halls was the École d’Alger : Fouchet, Audisio, Amrouche, Robles ,  writers who argued with him, staged his plays, and sharpened his sense of the Mediterranean as a philosophy. His first teacher, Louis Germain, had given him the scholarship that got him there. So Camus did not come to Dostoevsky cold. He came with Greek tragedy in his head, Russian despair in his hands, and Algerian sunlight in his body.

(Avtar Mota)

CHINAR SHADE by Autarmota is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.5 India License.
Based on a work at http:\\autarmota.blogspot.com\.